The DAP handled the protest at their HQ, we are informed, in most craven fashion. They locked their doors, switched off their front lights, and hid in their back offices.
The memorandum could not be handed over, we are told, but those present did manage to slip some of their placards under the door. Including one which described Ean Yong as a kitten killer defender. Which is precisely what he is.
We note with concern that some DAP supporters have tried to depict MAWS and Shenaaz as being politically motivated. Shenaaz, to our knowledge, has a long history of activism and she has many times unfearingly stood up to BN and its agencies.
Free speech and freedom of assembly are human rights, and cannot de demonised simply because it is targetted, in this case, against the representatives of parties you support.
Or there will be little to choose between the DAP and the BN.
Update : We have learned that DAP's non-presence to receive the memorandum was deliberate. It looks like they are worse than the BN in handling criticism. In fact, they brook no criticism at all. - The Owl, 12th March 2011, 4.05 pm.